Compras Arte10
Posters de Arte
Viajes de Arte
x 



carsa-arte


Amigos de Arte10
Portfolio Multimedia CMS10 Cocinar10.com
Cuaderno10 - Portal de Literatura 10Fotos Fluido Rosa


Arte10 Arte10
General (en español) General (en español)
Internacional (en inglés) Internacional (en inglés)

(Clic sobre las carpetas para abrirlas)

Redes de arte

Observatorio de noticias de arte contemporáneo en blogs nacionales e internacionales.

< En Portada


Redes de arte es un observatorio global de noticias de arte contemporáneo, centrado en blogs nacionales e internacionales de temática artística. Arte10 selecciona regularmente los mejores blogs, para acercarlos al público en formato de feed.


En español Internacional (en inglés) Blogs de Arte10 Ver Todos Incluye tu blog Canales activos  
  ¡Cada dos semanas comentamos en Fluido Rosa de RNE3 las novedades de Redes de arte!

Art & Perception (6 unread)

1 2 3 ... 10
  • Permalink for 'Some of the parts'

    Some of the parts

    Posted: 5-January-2009, 4:40am CET by Steve Durbin

    I’ve been photographing horses for well over a year now, and I’m feeling it’s time to put together a show, or at least a portfolio. I would be happy just continuing to make photographs indefinitely, but I’d be happier grappling with the work in another way as well, reviewing it and thinking about it and looking for themes or ideas. A few thoughts have been mentioned in previous posts, but none has risen to the level of forming the backbone of a potential statement. Perhaps the most striking thing to emerge from my photographs is a lack of interest in anything resembling a classic, noble, iconic western horse. In fact, I notice that none of the images selected for this post even depicts an entire animal (though I have some that do).

    One thing I realized in the course of the recent Morandi discussions is that the edges of the bodies are often blurred, or more generally obscured, either through intervening snow or grass…

    or motion blur…

    If it’s not that, then a conventional sense of wholeness tends to be defeated by awkward angles…

    or isolated details…

    Strangely enough, I somehow feel that through these various obscurations I’m actually trying to understand basic horse form. Perhaps it’s that it seems too easy when handed to you in an immediately graspable way. I need to synthesize a horse from the disparate parts and peculiar views to appreciate it. It sort of makes sense to me when I put it like that, though I have my doubts as to whether other viewers would see it the same way. And it doesn’t seem to be a statement yet.

    In thinking about this project, I may be aiming for something too neat and too intellectual. What I need fundamentally is a basis for editing decisions. I have so many images, I could easily mount a show limited to Eye of the Horse. When you are editing for an exhibit or portfolio submission, is simply liking an image enough to justify inclusion?

  • Permalink for 'Obama and the ARTS'

    Obama and the ARTS

    Posted: 2-January-2009, 9:31pm CET by Birgit Zipser

    Two points of interest are

    (A) Art inspired by Barack Obama.

    (B) Will the 2009 Economic Stimulus Package address unemployment among artists in analogy to the Federal Art Project, part of the Work Project Administration (WPA) created by Roosevelt?

    (A) Quoting Rob Walker, New York Times:

    Whether or not Barack Obama would make a good president, it?s clear that he makes an excellent muse. It?s hard to think of a political candidate in recent memory who has, in real time, inspired so much creativity, exercised free of charge and for the campaign?s benefit. Perhaps this suggests something about Obama ? or maybe it suggests something about his supporters.

    Shepard Fairey created this limited edition print of Barack Obama in an effort to fund a larger street poster campaign, January 2008. Fairey is one of today’s best known and most influential street artists. He sits on the advisory board of Reaching to Embrace the Arts, a not-for-profit organization that provides art supplies to disadvantaged schools and students.

    A painting ?Michelle and Sasha Obama Listening to Barack Obama at the Democratic National Convention, August 2008? by Elizabeth Peyton, another contemporary artist, was exhibited in the The New Museum in New York City’s Lower East Side neighborhood.

    Another manifestation of the enthusiasm for Obama within the art community was an auction that brought together the work of more than 100 contemporary artists enabling artObama raised over $46,000 for Obama?s presidential campaign.

    (B) Will the 2009 Economic Stimulus Package provide employment for artists?

    ?Sparty? at Michigan State University provides an example of the impact of a work of art funded by the 20th century Economic Stimulus Package, the Federal Art Project. MSU?s icon is much photographed at different times of day and seasons of the year (montage from pictures on the web).

    With an economic stimulus package, Barack Obama has proposed to ?put people back to work rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges, modernizing schools that are failing our children, and building wind farms and solar panels,” by adding 2.5 million jobs.

    An analogy is provided by the Works Project Administration (WPA) that was created by Franklin Delano Roosevelt to deal with the Great Depression. More than 8,500,000 Americans were hired to build roads, public buildings and parks and do other infrastructure work around the country. Unemployed artists were hired through the Federal Art Project, part of the WPA.

    The lasting legacy of art, funded by the Federal Art Project, can still be seen and enjoyed throughout USA.

  • Permalink for 'Inside Out: painting the outside from in'

    Inside Out: painting the outside from in

    Posted: 27-December-2008, 4:04am CET by June Underwood

    In a site called “Hold this Thought” Tom Livingston (Between Silence and Light) quotes architect Louis Kahn:

    Architect Louis Kahn’s writings about daylight resonate with me. Here he talks about the nature of a room and its natural light:

    “The room is not only the beginning of architecture: it is an extension of self. If you think about it, you realize that you don’t say the same thing in a small room that you say in a large room. If I were to speak in a great hall, I would have to pick one person who smiles at me in order to be able to speak at all.

    Also marvelous in a room is the light that comes through the windows of that room and that belongs to the room. The sun does not realize how wonderful it is until after a room is made. A man’s creation, the making of a room, is nothing short of a miracle. Just think, that a man can claim a slice of the sun.”

    [www.holdthisthought.org]

    I’m rather addicted to painting plein air, but the weather in western Oregon is more like eastern Kansas (ie snow, ice, slush, ugh!) right now. So I’ve been painting from my windows, which frame various neighborhood views and foliage. But the Kahn quote also gets me to thinking about the nature of rooms, which I haven’t painted.

    This is the unprepossessing set-up in my kitchen. The reason for painting in the kitchen, in spite of the traffic and the high window, is that the best tree in the vicinity faces the sink. It is a continual source of happiness to me — to be cleansing the cutlery while gazing at the ancient face of the huge cherry, with all its anciliary objects — squirrels, hanging plants, pots on the fence that leans against it.

    Above is the first version, Cherry Tree Trunk with Pots,  5″ x 5,” oil on board, that I began with.

    Here’sa larger version of the cherry tree with pots:

    Cherry Tree with Pots, 18 x 24, oil on board.

    This second was painted an hour or two later than the first. Already the snow had started to melt.

    I painted other things from inside:

    Firethorn off Front Porch, 5 x 5, oil on board

    Holly and Hydrangea, 5 x 5, oil on board

    Two Pots and Forsythia, 12 x 16, oil on board

    (The sizes on the various paintings may be somewhat inaccurate)

    But now I’m thinking I should include the inside with the outside. Not like this, although it definitely has charm — I am suspicious of charm, you know, so I won’t be painting this particular wintry scene:

    Or this:

    Or this:

    Actually, I did paint this last area, the approach to our back door, the “garden room”, from a different window, but the painting has some annoying problems, which I may or may not be able to fix.

    But as I think about it, I’m starting to see other ways the interior could be, not just a frame or a warm place to paint from, but an intrinsic, perhaps meaningful, part of the whole. Right now I’m looking directly at three large windows that frame the front porch. Inside, scattered around the room that acts as my textile studio and the living room when we need it is the easel I’ve been using to paint the out-of-doors, the palette on a folding table, a stereo/tuner/Cd player and a music keyboard, three cone-shaped “Christmas” trees made from filbert shells wrapped in yarn and sitting on a kind of low table that can be dismantled and hidden away, big old records and smaller CDs, a chair with canvases stacked on it, another chair pushed cattywampus out of the way, a sewing machine and a large quilted art work on the design wall, waiting to be cut up.  It’s the detritus of the season mixed with the detritus of my art work mixed with the things I soothe myself with, like music, while I’m working. No books or even magazines are in sight — they are all here beside me, near the computer, or beside the dining room table where we spend most of our communal life, or upstairs, piled beside my bed and in bookcases that line the hallway. The view outside is of the firethorn, now freed of its snow piles and an unprepossessing parking lot and condo across the street. None of this is “pretty” or in “good taste” but all of it is evidence that I am here, and that adventures of various sorts. visual, aural, physical, are waiting.

    There’s no way to photograph all that I’ve described in words — the light from outside blinds the camera to what’s inside and the camera angles leave out much of the debris. But I can see both out and in with relative clarity, a clarity that comes from intimate knowledge as much as from sight.

    In a book about a prominent Portland architect, A.E. Doyle, the author remarks that the tours of Europe taken by early Portland artists (say around 1905) were not about knowledge but about acquiring “good taste.” My living-room-cum-textile-now-painting studio is not about good taste; I guess it’s about acquiring knowledge, knowledge that can only be gained by working in, around, through, and with it. Maybe I should try painting it.

    Or, perhaps I should work on still lifes, made up of some of the detritus.

    Probably not. The thaw is coming and perhaps my buddy Jane will call and we’ll find another parking garage to haunt. But the inside of the room, the “claiming of a slice of the sun” — well, it’s enticing.

    How about your enticements? What draws and repels you to make art at this season, in your space, in your time?

  • Permalink for 'Janet Fish and my quest for edges and dissolving boundaries'

    Janet Fish and my quest for edges and dissolving boundaries

    Posted: 20-December-2008, 10:14pm CET by Birgit Zipser

    After sending me to the Morandi exhibit at the MET, my friend and mentor, Nancy Plum, introduced me to Janet Fish’s paintings. She lent me Gerrit Henry’s 1987 JANET FISH and as a present for Hanneke (Psst, don’t tell her), I bought Janet FISH PAINTINGS by Vincent Katz, a more recent version.

    Below are photographs of two of JF’s paintings, first F.W.F, 1976 (72 x 56″):

    Fascinating to see geometry outlined by edges! The dazzling quality of the painting appears to be due to, quoting JF:

    …I started sitting the bottles on mirrors, to bounce the light back up through them and intensify it. I’d paint the set-up all day long. If the light was terrific in the bottle at one moment, that’s when it was painted. I sort of set up a watch. And I’d look at things, and whatever was exciting that happened - in this situation where everything was always in flux - was recorded in the painting. The light is never in the same place for more than a second…

    .
    Vincent Katz likens the ‘artificiality ‘ in lighting due to capturing highlights at different time points to the artificiality in Dutch still life where flowers that bloom at different times of the year nevertheless appear in the same painting.

    The next picture is Orange Cloth/Orange Poppies, 2000 (48 x 60″):

    Edges are still accentuated. And, I think in this painting, there may be some dissolving of boundaries due to similarity in color of different shapes.

    Has anyone thought about Morandi and Fish at the same time?

    So far, I have only seen Morandi’s paintings in real life. I will attempt to see Janet Fish’ Grey Day (1978) in my town at the Kresge Art Museum Collection, Michigan State University. Nancy thinks that the painting may be archived. Thus, I will have to put in a request for special viewing after I return from Germany. More later,

    Happy New Year!

  • Permalink for 'Twixt Light and Shadow'

    Twixt Light and Shadow

    Posted: 13-December-2008, 5:09am CET by Jay

    Birgit asked if anyone employed a strongly contrasting treatment between the illuminated and the shadowed side of an object as seen in Morandi’s late painting. I’ve been tripping over a painting, that I did a few years ago, that might fill the bill.

    It’s a relic of a brief fascination that I had with graffiti cut into the bark of trees.  In this case I followed the dictates of my camera in b/w mode. I projected the image onto plywood and created a relief effect in the darks. The camera saw no distinction in value on the lit side and I did the same. Birgit, does this simple example qualify?

  • Permalink for 'Two paintings, two challenges'

    Two paintings, two challenges

    Posted: 12-December-2008, 8:39pm CET by June Underwood

    On Monday, I painted two plein aire oils from the uppermost level of a parking garage. On Tuesday I attended a crit session with some other painters that I meet with regularly. OF course, I showed them the paintings.

    I managed to remember to photograph the first painting twice — once as it emerged from the garage session, and then again after I had been through the critique and had tweaked it in the studio. I didn’t do a lot to this  painting in my second go-round, but when I finished I was concerned about the loss of some of the “naive” quality of the red building. Here are images of the two versions:

    Library Parking Garage, View South (first draft) 12 x 16, oil on board

    Library Parking Garage, South View (draft 2), etc.

    The differences between the two are slight, but the concern expressed by one member of the crit group was about the wonky perspective on the red building. I later mucked about with that building (as well as darkening the edge of the roofline the takes up much of the bottom of the painting  and which will get more work). I’m not sure the red building, as it now stands, is what I want. Another person suggested perhaps making all the buildings more wonky, which I didn’t have time for, but would still consider.

    This series of decisions (as well as a rather funny comment by a fellow critiquer)  is what made my ears perk up when I read the Schiller quote. Is the first wonky take more “naive” in Schiller’s sense, than the second, somewhat less wonky, version? The comment from my fellow painter (who actually defended the wonky perspective) was something like “I’d like to be behind your eyes, seeing what you see when you drive down the street.”

    The second painting references the Morandi/edge discussion and is a continuation of my visual wandering around the constructs of edges. I don’t have a photograph of the original post-garage painting, but the photo below is of the painting after I worked it a bit prior to the critique session. My hasty working was to try to eliminate the edge that runs down the slab of building in the center of the painting. My intent was to push that building out of the way of the steeple and crane, both of which were central to what I was seeing.

    The Library Parking Garage, West view (draft 1) 12 x 16, oil on board

    After the critique, I modified the edge treatment of the slab, as well as pushing back, through losing the edges, the church roof and the foreground building edging. I also added shadows and changed hues a bit — the result is shown in the image below.

    The Library Parking Garage, West view (draft 2)

    This last version, below, now sits in my studio, awaiting further revelations; I have made the slab more colorful and attempted to mirror somewhat the big block of sky on the other side. I also modified some of the color in the bottom righthand building.

    The Library Parking Garage, West view (draft 4)

    So to recap: In the first version, which is close to what the original looked like,  I tried losing the edge of the big building on the right. Then I went to the critique meeting, where the lost edges were seen as too lost but also some of the other edges as too defined; so I added the lighter strip down the side of the big frontal slab and muckled about with the edges of the other buildings. Further emendations included changing some of the color, sharpening the steeple and church elements, and attempts at making the slab wall on the right echo something of the sky on the left.

    I’m still debating about reinforcing that edge and wondering what it is that losing or finding or almost finding an edge means to the painting as a whole. What I was thinking of while I was painting was the sharpness of the steeple and the crane and the losing any impact of the slab, in spite of its size on the canvas (and in my view). That’s what happens in cities — people no longer see the altered, mangled buildings that sometimes inject themselves into photographs. But why did Morandi lose his edges as he does — is it the sense of oneness of all things, the lack of object individuality that he’s concentrating on? And then he delineates a very strong contour line on the opposite side of his lost edge, so he not only finds the other edges but thrusts it at us. Somewhat like that crane thrusts itself…..

    OK, I’m through meandering. Please comment willy-nilly as you will. And I’m interested in why one loses or finds or sharpens or softens edges — not as a matter of aesthetics or realism, if you will, but as a matter of intent and philosophy.

  • Permalink for 'Giorgio Morandi - late work'

    Giorgio Morandi - late work

    Posted: 5-December-2008, 1:51am CET by Birgit Zipser

    The two paintings by Giorgio Morandi shown here interest me because of what Steve called  their ‘dissolving boundaries’. The first one was done in 1960:

    Here is an excerpt showing the boundary between the  left aspect of the vessel and its background:

    Looking at this excerpt here on the web shows a clear boundary between the vessel and the background. However, in the museum, standing back from this painting and viewing it from some distance made the boundary disappear. The left aspect of the vessel melted into the background. It was a fun experiment going close to the painting and then moving away while observing the boundary disappear, giving the impression that the top of the vessel was vertically cut in half.

    GM finished this second painting before his death in 1964:

    Here is its excerpt showing the left aspect of the vessel against the background:

    This excerpt of the 1964 painting indicates the similarity in color between the vessel and the background. Here the boundary can be sensed from different directions of the paint strokes. A fascinating method.

    A comment on the color in Morandi?s paintings: The pictures shown here were scanned from the book currently sold at the Met ?Giorgio Morandi 1890 ? 1964?. After I bought the book, I compared the colors of its reproduction with the actual colors of the paintings while standing right in front of the  paintings and I took notes. Regrettably, the colors in all the reproductions are consistently warmer than the beautifully cool colors in the paintings. GM painted cool yellows, reds, greys and not in the warmer, ‘candified’ hues shown in the reproductions. What a disservice to the GM?s legacy to falsify the colors in what may be become an important resource book.  I attempted to reduce some of  false warmth by desaturating yellow in my scanned photos.

    What do I like in the two paintings shown here besides their ?dissolving boundaries?? In the 1960 painting, the cool red is fascinating. There is a ‘vibration’ between the white vessel in front, the oval of the  top of the red vessel and the cooler greyish vessel in the back. In GM?s last 1964 painting, the cool, feeble looking yellow of the vessel contrasts with the clear turquoise (clearer than apparent on the web pic) of the round shape in front. I had not seen this turquoise hue in any of his other paintings. - At death’s door, GM expressed something like ‘how very much he still wanted to realize his new ideas with painting’ - a touching thought.

    In summary, during my first visit of the Morandi exhibition, I embraced two of his 1914 Natura Morta because of their clear lines. In contrast, during my second visit, I learned to very much appreciate the two Natura Morta shown here, painted about 50 years later.

  • Permalink for 'More Morandi'

    More Morandi

    Posted: 4-December-2008, 4:15am CET by Jay

    My apologies for not being more visible in this discussion, but it’s been more fun just kibitzing.

    But I’ve noticed that Morandi has become front-of-mind of late; to the extent that his characteristics are influencing what gets my attention. Today I was cutting pieces of plexiglass to make into chains. I was lining them up when - behold - there was a little Morandi assembly.

    Frankly, there’s little resemblance. No painterliness is in evidence, but things are arranged after a fashion and one can see an intersection of table and wall. For some reason this was enough to trigger the association.

    The plexiglass blocks go into the likes of this prototype seen here in a basket of apples. I’m tempted to make up some shapes similar to those used by Morandi - this as an adjunct to Steve’s experiments with the bottles.

    I was going to ask rhetorically if you find your focus and sensitivities influenced by these discussions on A&P, but I know the answer already. For me, the scanner of limited attention, it’s the concentration. Any comments?

  • Permalink for 'Photo Morandi II'

    Photo Morandi II

    Posted: 2-December-2008, 4:50pm CET by Steve Durbin

    It’s been instructive to continue experimenting with photography à la Morandi: not attempting to imitate, but rather to explore some of the themes he seems to be working with, or at least what I find myself working with as I go about it. One thing I realized looking at more of his pictures, both online at the Metropolitan and the Morandi Museum, and also in a book found at the library, is that he was often interested in the modeling of masses by the light falling on him. This was contrary to my impression from the quite flat images that seem to be more common. Perhaps working in both modes was his own form of experimentation.

    My first job was to find a plain background, and also work with lighter, more Morandi-like colors (though I personally tend to prefer dark ones) than before. In arranging a still life with bottles, etc, I was very aware that it was hard for me to get anything interesting. I certainly didn’t succeed. On the other hand, I can’t say I find Morandi’s arrangements very interesting, either. It became quite clear that playing with edge alignments, making them rhyme or overlap or extend, afforded a necessary compensating interest that occupied Morandi even more than it did me. Picture after picture from the book exhibited the same kinds of relationships. In this vein, Morandi was said by his friend Roberto Longhi to have admired Seurat for “mathematically” planned compositions and Mondrian for his strict rigor (for more, click on “The Care for the Image” at the Morandi Museum home page.

    Another observation on composition: Morandi seems to have had little concern for the negative space in his still lifes, or at least they seem unremarkable that way. His objects are, in fact, almost always jammed together, leaving no negative space at all. My second composition, with one bottle well off to the side, is very un-Morandi.

    In general, Morandi’s attention seems to have been mostly on the individual objects, and certain aspects of their close relationships. I noticed that one effect of vague boundaries or coincidental alignments is to draw the eye to those places, where I find a local appeal stronger than the whole.

    I did make one attempt to create a more “painterly” image by partially posterizing it to simulate a limited palette. Below, the top image is the result of that treatment, the bottom is the original. I’ve deliberately not overemphasized this, so you have to look a little closely to see the difference.

    If nothing else, this exercise has convinced me of the usefulness of copying as a means of learning style and technique. It’s been helpful for me in getting to know Morandi. And I expect that some aspects of his approach will find their way into future photographs.

    Have you ever engaged in copying as an instructional method? Was it effective for you?

  • Permalink for 'Up for Approval'

    Up for Approval

    Posted: 30-November-2008, 7:27am CET by June Underwood

    Across from my normal sitting place in our dining room (which is really our living/kitchen/common room) are some paintings –Frippery, 36 x 40″ oil on canvas,  Condon Library (far left), and Heppner Courthouse, both 12 x 16 inches, oil on board.

    To my right as I sip my morning coffee, are some other paintings, Numen and Heart, both 30 x 40 inches, oil on canvas:

    To the left is a window that often acts as a painting:


    Far left, on a slight diagonal wall over the fireplace, is another painting, the Mascall Formation Overlook, 18 x 36″, oil on canvas.

    What all of these have in common is that I look and live with them daily. And, for the most part, they are my own creation (out of modesty, I don’t claim to have created either the flowers nor the foliage outside the window).

    Looking and living with your own creations leaves you few excuses for bad work. There they are, the paintings you did or the flowers you arranged or the foliage you planted, staring back at you, day after day. It’s a wonderful, merciless experience and grand for teaching one about one’s art.

    The questions I ask myself, over time, are as follows: Why did I like this art when I first put it on the wall? What does it do to the room? What do I look at most often within it? Do I like this art a week later? A month later?  Six months (if it lasts that long) later? Do I even “see” it after it hangs for a while or does it just disappear from consciousness? What will be done with it when I take it down — stored, destroyed, sold, revamped, revisited, reviled?  Are there better works to be done, inspired by this one? Do I ever want to do anything like this again?

    Naturally the piece immediately in front of my coffee-drinking face is the one that garners the most attention. It gets the most criticism. And sometimes gets most extensively redone. Or taken down and put into deep storage. Often I move the ones from the sides to the front, in order to better assess what they are like when they are “in my face.” But sometimes, even on as they hang to one side, I can suss out the necessary info.

    For the last six or so months, I had a 5 x 9 foot textile piece hanging on the right wall: Goose Rock, 48 x 108″, painted cotton, backed and batted with cotton, machine stitched.

    By the time I took Goose Rock down, I was seriously annoyed with it. Right now it’s stored, but shortly it will either be cut into three pieces, almost equal in size, and/or given the “needle” treatment — that is, much more heavily quilted. It may even go back to the studio and get painted on more, probably after I’ve done more stitching over the top. Or maybe I will cut it into 3 unequal pieces and then cut the worst-composed one into more pieces and do something with all three thereafter to make it stop annoying me!

    There’s also a kind of monotony to the piece that I’m not sure what I can do about. The effect of such a large wall covering is like that of tapestry — but tapestry tends to be multiplicitous in its imagery — or sometimes, like abstract art and color field painting, large swatches of subtle color. This representational kind of work might simply not be right for the large wall hanging. Or it might be that the wall on which it hung was not right for the work.

    As you can tell, I’m still thinking about what needs doing to the piece that no longer pleases my eye and my visceral reactions (ie my gut). Next I’ll probably move one of the right side paintings to the front, so I can give it an equal share of criticism.

    What art do you have hanging around that you think of changing — or keeping in exactly the same place forever? Does anyone else use their favorite sitting room as a critique gallery? Do you frame and hang your photographs and art? Do you keep bins of not-quite-discarded materials from which you may someday rescue them? How do you critique your own work and what do you do with it once you’ve come to some kind of semi-conclusion?

1 2 3 ... 10