the art life

• 

  Welcome to Art Life 2.0

  Posted: 29-April-2010, 1:18pm CEST

  Greetings - The Art Life is now being published at our brand new address: theartlife.com.au. Come and see!
  
  [Email subscriber? There's no need to update your details on our new site - hopefully everything has gone to plan and you'll receive updates automatically.]
• 

  "Going, going, going..."

  Posted: 26-April-2010, 2:33am CEST

  You've no doubt been wondering what all these "May 1st, 2010" posts have been about [see comments below]. As of Friday April 30th [this Friday] this blog will cease to exist.
  
  
  
  
  In its place will be a brand new Art Life launching on Saturday May 1st, with a new crew of writers and a refreshed and reinvigorated mission to clean up the art scene, right some wrongs and do some good in the world.
  
  We'll update you later in the week about our new five year plan, but for now here are some important things to know:
  
  

  • The Art Life at this Blogger address will only continue until May 15th, 2010, after which we'll be redirecting you our new home.
  • We've migrated all our old posts, but they will all be at new URLs so if you have linked to reviews or other pieces in the past, those links won't work after May 15th. Most of the old posts will be kept, but a lot of the free ads, pr material and other stuff will be deleted - if you want to keep copies for yourself, feel free to copy them direct from the blog.
    
  • Comments left on old posts have been archived but once the re-direct is in place, you won't be able to see them. If for some twisted reason you want to save your comments, or comment strings left in the days when people didn't know how to behave online, you'll need to find the old posts and cut and paste the comments.
  • Links from the Art Life to artist web sites, blogs, art media and galleries are being updated -but if you're not currently listed but you want a presence at our new home - email us at the usual address.
  • If you're one of the 2,000 + people who receive Art Life updates via email, we're doing our best to migrate the mailing list - but there may be a few hiccups. We'll keep you updated.

  We want to say a big thank you to our readers, friends in the blogosphere, allies in old media and all the artists and galleries who've supported this blog since its launch back in 2004.
  
  See you after the jump.
• 

  May 1st, 2010

  Posted: 21-April-2010, 6:33am CEST

  
  
  "The Messiah doesn't need miracles. He is the miracle. Now he's here. Are you ready? I'm here to tear down everything around you, and you know what I'm going to replace it with? Something new. So take your bread and give it to the poor. What difference does it matter what you own? You have gold and silver? It's going to rot, and that rot is going to eat away your heart. All of you! There will be a flood, and there will be a fire. Everything will be destroyed. But there will be a new ark riding on that fire, and I hold the keys and I open the door, and I decide who goes in and who doesn't. You're my brothers from Nazareth, and you're the first I invite on the ark. Don't wait. Don't waste your life. Come with me."
• 

  May 1st, 2010

  Posted: 12-April-2010, 2:19am CEST

  
  
  "We're only interested in one thing, Bart. Can you tell a story? Can you make us laugh? Can you make us cry? Can you make us want to break out in joyous song? Is that more than one thing? Okay!"
• 

  May 1st, 2010...

  Posted: 29-March-2010, 1:58am CEST

  
• 

  A fabulous beast?

  Posted: 20-March-2010, 1:44am CET

  From Julie Kearney...
  
  In Brisbane?s new GOMA - which currently hosts the Sixth Asia-Pacific Triennial - a room has been set aside for a bubble-encrusted stuffed elk whose fur can be seen expanding and multiplying behind the distorting glass baubles. It?s one of the star attractions of the show and features as its advertising logo. Alone in the whiteness of its special room the dead animal carries the authority of Art by virtue of being so displayed. Art it undoubtedly is, but it?s also a sad slaughtered creature, killed not for eating but display, first stuffed by a taxidermist and now transformed into a bizarre aesthetic experience for bemused crowds of sightseers.
  
  
  
  The quality of work in the current exhibition of Asia-Pacific art is far from the wonders of APT1 and APT2 but no one seems to have noticed. The tabloid reviews to date have been universally approving and the viewers, drifting through the galleries in their recently vastly increased numbers, enjoying their new-found role as public art connoisseurs, appear to be satisfied too.
  
  On the other hand, it should be remembered that we the public, are the beneficiaries of Queensland?s woeful art education policies which deprived most of us in our formative years of our right to an education in the visual arts. And to this state of ignorance may perhaps be added the pernicious influence of house and garden magazines - the only journals concerned with aesthetics that most of us read ? which for some years now have been informing us that the most desirable artwork we can hang on our living room walls is a piece of framed wallpaper. It?s a view that gives a new dimension to the hitherto derogatory term, wallpaper art. Today we live among wallpaper art. It flourishes not only above our sofas but in the public galleries to which we take our children.
  
  The depoliticisation of art is nothing new. We have been schooled in acceptance of content-free work, art for art?s sake, ?high art? in other words, except for one astonishing digression: the first couple of Asia-Pacific Triennials. These earlier exhibitions, in 1993 and 1996, spectacularly broke that mould. They showed us, through the works of artists drawn from countries politicized by undemocratic structures, that art could be different, that it could be powerful and moving and deeply political while still remaining aesthetically diverse and exciting, often more so. In a range of media and genres, works by artists from our neighbouring Asia-Pacific countries gave the lie to the received view that ?political? art can?t be ?high? or even art at all because it is merely dull, dishonest work serving the needs of totalitarian states. Such propagandist political art exists, of course. We have seen it in exhibitions of Chinese art since the 70?s and we know about it from the degenerative forms of state art under Stalin which followed hard on the heels of the first fine flush of genuinely political, innovative works by the Constructivists. Non state-controlled, these earlier Russian artists left a legacy we still draw on today, in our modern concept of the artist?s book for instance, which was developed by them as a strategy for communicating with the people in the years following the Russian Revolution.
  
  It?s interesting that the kind of state sponsored political art which followed the Constructivists is present also in the current APT, in a series of finely executed colour woodcuts and sensitive portraits from North Korea. Much has been made of the daring inclusion of these works simply because they are ?political? though in fact only a small proportion of them are propagandist. What is surprising about them, and political by implication in a different way, is that the non propagandist North Korean works bear a marked resemblance in style and technique to Australian work in the thirties. Printmaking flourished here in the 30s and most of the twenty-first century North Korean woodcuts on show could be mistaken for works by Jessie Traill or Violet Teague. The Korean woodcuts featuring bridges and other industrial structures are uncannily like the images of Sydney Harbour Bridge that were so popular with artists during the years of its construction. Like North Korea now, Australia in the 30?s was a culturally conservative society, the majority of its artists yet to break away from the restraining influence imposed by Robert Menzies? feared Australian Academy of Art, in order to take advantage of the possibilities offered by Post-Impressionism and Cubism. It seems that North Korean artists today are in a similar situation. Many viewers, enjoying the accessibility of their works, would say that this is not a bad thing and this is a valid opinion though not the point here. Artists should always be free to make choices as to which direction they go in, whether we like that direction or not, for without freedom art becomes stultified and dies. Art is another word for creativity and by definition needs to be free to change if it wishes.
  
  For those of us who remember the first Asia-Pacific exhibitions, there is another kind of political art, not state sponsored or controlled by the likes of Stalin, Menzies and Kim Jong-il, but work that comes from the hands of individuals living and working in inequitable societies or simply responding to the depredations by capitalism upon the environment. Who can forget the work of Japanese artist Shigeo Toya in the inaugural APT? Titled Woods 11 and now in the possession of the Queensland Art Gallery, it was and is a massive forest of chain-sawed trees, stunningly sculptural in its textural interplay of forms. It was also moving for many viewers as they walked among the branchless trees because it appeared to be a powerful comment on the destruction of the world?s forests.
  
  Anyone who saw it will also remember the burning man installation in the Sculpture Garden at the second APT. The work of Indonesian artist Christanto Dadang, it was created in response to the burning and raping of many Indonesians of Chinese origin in May, 1998. At Dadang?s symbolic burnings at the Queensland Art Gallery, life-size effigies of men were slowly consumed by fire and crowds of Australian viewers, visibly moved, stood watching in total silence for up to an hour. Dadang?s hope for this work, that it would act as ?a shock capable of illuminating our sense of humanity? was fully realized. (APT2 catalogue p.200.)
  
  Or who remembers the installation, also at APT2, titled All Stock Must Go! ? It was set up on the grass at the entrance to the gallery rather than inside, at the request of its designers - the Brisbane Campfire Group - and it featured a cattle truck stocked with Aboriginal artworks which were produced on site by the artists themselves and sold to anyone who wished to buy. All Stock Must Go! challenged among other things the perception of overseas buyers that Australian Aboriginal art is ?takeaway? art, and it drew attention, through the presence of Black artists painting cross-legged on the grass, to the reality for Aboriginal people of having to produce art for survival. The cattle truck, later dismantled and sold piece by piece, made reference to the cattle trucks used to move Aboriginal tribal people to reserves.
  But most surprising of all was the Queensland Art Gallery?s connivance in a subversive act directed partially against itself. The refusal to place the installation within the walls of the gallery was a statement of outsiderness directed against the traditional practices of appropriation and decontextualistion by museums and art galleries both here and around the world. ?We are invited to enter the museum but we choose to stay outside.? (Margo Neale, APT2 catalogue, p.10)
  
  Now it is possible, though perhaps not probable, that such a piece of political art directed against its host gallery would be condoned by the current gallery administration. It happened in 1996 with the help of indigenous curator Margo Neale but we have not seen its like since in any of the following four Triennials. What we have seen instead is a steady diminution in quality and diversity together with a move towards video viewing alcoves and away from the interactive installations that were enjoyed in the first two APTs. There were so many of these interactive artworks that the Queensland Art Gallery took on the atmosphere of a fun fair and resounded with chatter. People walked about with smiles on their faces and got into conversations with strangers about what they were seeing and doing. The National Committee formed to decide curatorial philosophy for the inaugural APT had clearly opted to make museum art friendly, to welcome people and make them want to come back again.
  
  Heidegger suggests that an artwork has to be true to its name. That is, it must work. This seems a fair enough statement and if we agree with it, we should be able to ask of any given piece: is this working or is it unemployed? Does it give us joy or surprise through its formal arrangements? Does it have meaning for us, resonate with our experience of life or act to change it in some way? When we sit in a video alcove watching out-of-focus flickering images of grass which someone has taken with a hand-held camera while walking through the same grass, does it work for us in any of the above ways? If it doesn?t then it isn?t an artwork. It?s as simple as that. It may resonate for the next viewer, though in the case of the out-of-focus grass, it?s unlikely he or she will be in the majority.
  
  In the catalogue foreword for the inaugural Asia-Pacific Triennial, Doug Hall tells us that the exhibition was designed to highlight ?the dynamics of change, identities, and even twentieth century cultural dislocation.? (My italics. APT1, p.6.) By the fourth APT, which also marked the launch of the opening of the new gallery GOMA, the aim had shrunk to revealing ?the depth and diversity of individual expression.? (APT4, p.12.) In the catalogue of the sixth APT now before us, Tony Ellwood makes no general claims for the show at all except to identify without comment the video of Reggae music, the Mekong River works and the North Korean exhibit, as being its key features.
  
  The current exhibition is not entirely bereft of political art but there is less of it and it tends to be low-key so that often you don?t know it is meant to be political unless you take the trouble to read the accompanying placard. Political art that needs explaining, I would suggest, is not political, or at least not political enough to cross cultural boundaries and have meaning for an Australian audience.
  
  All art does not have to be political of course. It simply has to work, but in many cases the exhibits in APT6 do not work, at least for me. There are a lot of video installations with very few people watching them, or watching them to the end, like the one of rickshaw drivers lying still and exhausted on their rickshaws. We get the point, the poor fellows are exhausted, but there?s not much motivation after a while to continue watching a moving film in which nothing moves. There?s a canopy of what looks like photocopy paper suspended by metal clips above the elevators which I didn?t know was an artwork until I learned from the catalogue that it was. There?s a wonderful old wooden house from the Sichuan Province that the artist has had dismantled by Chinese labourers and shipped to Australia for reassembly. It has real presence but is it an artwork or should it more appropriately be housed in an anthropological museum as an artefact? (Duchamp, eat your heart out.)
  
  On a recent visit to GOMA I got into conversation with a member of the security staff while we waited for a lift. I told her I had enjoyed the interactive work called Liminal Air and she said that she had been invited by the artist, just after he finishing installing it, to try it out and that she loved it too. I wasn?t asking her any questions but she told me that the hanging photocopy paper above the escalators looked better at night when the light shone through it, making it ripple and look like a crocodile?s back. And she said that the theme of the current APT was domestic objects and repetition. I thought that sounded right and asked if it was the official theme. Oh no, she said, that?s just how it seems to me.
  
  Everyone gets something different from art and this woman had found things I hadn?t. Perhaps I?m just a griper. Perhaps it?s the best APT ever. I doubt it though. Most of us lack the necessary tools to discriminate thanks to the failure of successive Queensland governments to address the issue of primary school art education, so most of us have to take what we can from visits to our public galleries. We will always take something away but we could take a lot more.
  People know what they like. Who doesn?t? That?s one thing we can still be sure of despite being deprived of the proper tools to understand visual language. We know what we like, but because we feel we don?t know enough about ?Art? and therefore have perhaps failed to understand some vital point, we?re unlikely to speak up about our opinions. It?s too easy, from the standpoint of enforced ignorance, to make a fool of ourselves. We the public, products of the Queensland school system, know our place. In the case of the current APT, I would suggest, there is something to speak up about, but nobody is speaking. We have been sold a pup in return for our taxes when we could have had a fabulous beast. And by that I don?t mean a stuffed elk.
• 

  There is no there there

  Posted: 20-March-2010, 2:07am CET

  Matt Logue is a Los Angeles based artist, photographer and animator. After working for the Tippett Studio - and spending three years in New Zealand on the Lord of The Rings trilogy - he returned to the US to pursue more personal work. Logue?s Empty LA project is a stunning visualisation of a world emptied of people.
  
  
  
  
  The Art Life: In your Empty LA series you?re presenting a vision of a city that could never be fully experienced. What was your inspiration for the series?
  
  Matt Logue: The inspiration for the series came, perhaps predictably, while on the freeway, driving to work. The thoughts that kept coming back was, ?How did we get here? Why did we do it like this?? From there, I imagined an empty city, the sounds you would hear in the skyscraper canyons, the animals returning to make their homes in the shelters we?d built. After that, I simply had to see it, I couldn?t not do it, so after working out a technique to do it through trial and error, spend most of my free time for the past four years working on the images.
  
  TAL: Empty cities, ruins and vacant spaces seem very much in vogue at the moment, what with all the post apocalyptic movies and books like ?The World Without Us? ? yet they also recall a Romantic vision of the Sublime landscape. What do you suppose the viewer feels when they look at these contemporary images?
  
  ML: By far the most common response I?ve gotten from people is ?That is so creepy/spooky/unsettling,? followed by ?I wish I could experience that.? While seeing each image gradually emerge, I would experience a surprisingly intense feeling of what I can only describe as relief, finally getting to see the empty freeways and downtown. My favorite images from other artists always leave me making up stories in my head or asking questions about the work ? not necessarily about the technique, but about the relationships depicted, the evolution of civilization that led to a particular image. The art that keeps me coming back leaves some room for the viewer to participate in it, and I think people feel that with these images. They?re visually striking and I think they also strike an emotional chord with people, especially citizens of L.A.
  
  TAL: How do you see your Empty LA work sitting with your other landscape work? The juxtaposition between natural landscapes and the artifice of the empty city work is startling.
  
  ML: Empty LA was a departure from my other landscape work. For me, taking photos for the sole purpose of making a beautiful image is becoming more and more difficult ? I keep wanting to place my images in the context of humanity and where we?re going or what our possible futures are. Lately I feel like making straight landscape images is like eating dessert three meals of the day ? it can be fun, but becomes less and less fulfilling. Which is not to say that I don?t admire landscape photographers, far from it, but I think I trend more towards the school of thought of people like Richard Misrach and Robert Polidori, who make some absolutely stunning images while framing them in the context of the built world rather than just the strictly natural world. The other way Empty LA was different was that I had a relatively narrow project to work on and could really narrow down my thinking ? my landscape work has been mainly done during stolen time when I?m travelling with my family or riding my bike around LA.
  
  
  
  
  TAL: What did you do with Tippett and Lord of The Rings? Did that experience cross over into your photography work?
  
  ML: I started at Tippett as a kind of low-level technician, making mattes for the compositors. I actually applied as an animator, so I came in early every day and worked like a dog to get into the animation department, which finally happened after about a year there. I animated on a few shows and then my wife and I moved to New Zealand, where I was an animator on all three Lord of the Rings films. While working as an animator, we frequently have to make the best of poorly-shot background plates, while making pleasing compositions. I think that daily practice in composition really helps me in my photography, and my photography in turn helps my animation ? because I know a lot about traditional and digital photography, I?ve often been called on to do jobs outside of animation at the companies I work for.
  
  TAL: The Empty LA images suggest a post apocalyptic scenario, a sci-fi narrative of some sort, yet at the same time there?s something oddly calming about them. Is there an element of wish fulfillment or fantasy in the images?
  
  ML: The post-apocalyptic scenario is something I thought about a lot while working on it, but I left it intentionally vague ? I didn?t want it to be too much of a narrative. This goes back to that ?leaving space for the viewer? idea ? I purposefully didn?t go into why or how humans had disappeared, only that they didn?t exist in this world anymore. Now what? What would happen to the city? For me, and for many other people, it?s very calming to imagine the planet continuing without us ? the sun rises and sets, rain falls, animals live and die, all without our intervention. I, probably like many people, would be very interested to see how the world would develop in our absence. Many people have told me they wish they could experience that, to walk the highways from the sea into downtown, but what most interests me is imagining how the planet itself would develop without us. I don?t want to read too much into people?s responses, but I believe there?s another angle to this as well, given the current situation we?re in with the climate and environment. I think there?s an underlying sense of hopelessness in many people about what we as a species have done and are doing to the planet, and underneath that, a feeling of guilt. We?re so entrenched in our way of life that it feels impossible to do what needs to be done in time to keep massive climate change from happening, and seeing the world emptied of people, if only for a few minutes in a series of photographs, gives us a respite from that.
  
  
  
  
  TAL: Absence is very powerful ? your removal of people, cars, aircraft also takes away the point of identification most viewers would have when looking at images of a city. In some ways these images are almost like those classical images of natural landscapes by Ansel Adams. Was that a part of your thinking?
  
  
  ML: I purposefully decided on a more formal approach to this series, to try and stay as anonymous as possible in my viewpoint. I even went so far as to not caption or identify the images ? aside from the copyright information and the title page, there?s no text in the book. It?s a way of treating the city that?s been built up over the years as a natural landscape, because in the absence of humans, that?s exactly what it would be. Freeways might become migration routes, office buildings might be enormous bird habitats, and so on. The formal aspect of it also provides a framework for people to hang their own narratives and questions on, as opposed to me dictating people?s individual experiences of the images.
  
  TAL: Without wanting to lift the veil too much on your process, could you tell us a little about the way the images were made? They seem, online at least, to almost seemless ? was that the effect you wanted to achieve?
  
  ML: Well, sadly it was never much of a veil ? most of the images could only have been done digitally! It?s a curious situation ? when people first see it, one of the first questions they ask is, ?How did you do it?? To be completely honest, discussing my own techniques quickly becomes tiresome, as people ask what lenses or cameras I used, or what version of Photoshop, etc. Of course, I?d love to know that stuff about other photographers? work, so I suppose I?m a bit of a hypocrite. The seamless effect was something I was going for, I wanted it to look and feel as natural as possible. In a nutshell, they?re mosaics of anywhere from thirty to well over one hundred images, all taken as close as possible to each other in time, and hand-blended in such a way as to remove the cars and people. I had to work backward from the framing and final print size I wanted and reverse-engineer how and when I was going to take the pictures. Google Street View helped immensely in scouting locations, usually overpasses and pedestrian walkways that didn?t have high protective barriers.
  
  Matt Logue?s Empty LA can be purchased from Blurb.com Originally posted by our sister-blog Science Fictional
• 

  Apres Video: "F#$%ing fantastic!"

  Posted: 5-March-2010, 12:36am CET

  From Carrie Miller
  
  I know what you?re wondering. What?s that smell? Well, it?s the decomposing corpse of video art in the stockrooms of prestigious contemporary art galleries around the world.
  
  Twenty years ago none of us could have predicted the breathtaking ascendancy of the video art genre and its attendant market in recent times. After years of poor old Mike Parr plugging earnestly away, it seemed that the genre suddenly exploded a few years ago.
  
  
  
  But neither could we have predicted its demise. The so-called art expert that created this blog certainly didn?t see it coming. He put all his now rotting eggs into the basket of video art with his forthcoming book on the topic. From here on in, it can only sit impotently in his bottom drawer, a mere redundancy, a cultural irrelevance.
  
  It?s not often that the death of an art form can be precisely pinned down. But let the record show that October the 9th, 2009 was the day the music died for video art.
  
  Up until this point artists have only ever dealt in the perfume of the video form. Appropriately enough in this postmodern world, it?s taken an outsider to distill it to its essence. His name is Steve Walsh and he?s my hero. In a mere 47 seconds he puts an end to an entire industry of filmic pretension and posturing. With his crappy promotional video for an epi-centre of bourgeois leisure at the heart of Australia?s most vacuous city ? Sydney?s Centennial Park - Walsh has done what even the great Tony Schwensen would struggle to: capture the banal truths of middle-class existence in a succinct and brutally unconsidered way. This amateur has achieved what Manet could have only hoped to with Le déjeuner sur l'herbe had he been a bit less French.
  
  I don?t want to panic any contemporary art collectors out there, but you know those discs with that guy skateboarding in the rain that you tripped over each to acquire? The following is irrefutable proof that you?ve been had.
  
  If you're viewing this post via email, click here to see the video. Caution: probably not safe for work.
• 

  Beyond The Edge

  Posted: 16-February-2010, 12:24am CET

  Some months back we posted an image by Ross Racine. After the artist got in touch to ask us to let readers know that he has new work available on his web site, we asked if he'd agree to a short email interview. Conducted over the last month, Ross offered some insights into his work:
  
  The Art Life: You've spoken before on the method you use to make your images, but could you briefly explain your combination of techniques?
  
  Ross Racine: The note on my technical process, available on my site, gives an overview of how I proceed. In a nutshell, the process involves creating the artwork in two steps: the first and main one is drawing freehand directly with the computer, and the second one is printing the image on paper with an inkjet printer. The drawing phase involves working with Photoshop with a pen and a tablet, aside from some preparatory work in Illustrator. In Photoshop, I start from a blank ground and build up the image with a small set of basic tools, such as selection, painting and cloning tools, copying and pasting, layers, luminosity and contrast controls, grain and smoothness modifications, and automation. In short, the process is a combination of digitally drawn material and various transformations done to this material.
  
  
  
  
  Ross Racine, New Foxtown and Westhaven Villas, 2008.
  Digital drawing, 60x80cms.
  
  RR: One of the main properties of digital drawing is a virtual, non-material working environment. The fact that the image is not bound to a physical base has several advantages. It allows various combinations of techniques and treatments, an ease in modifying the whole image at once, an ease in copying and cutting, moving and pasting parts of the work (within an image as well as between images), the blending of layers of variable translucency, and the creation of copies of the image in progress (to save steps in the generation of the work and to create different versions of a work). Working in the virtual world also means the image can be altered at any time, even after a final version is established, thus creating a new, different image from a "final" one. Another property of the medium is its very fast speed compared to most physical media. This allows a very short delay between intention and result, as little time is needed to try out various ideas.
  
  TAL: The result of your approach creates pictures that land somewhere between photography and drawing, and they have an almost hyper-real quality to them - is your intention that the viewer respond in a particular way?
  
  RR: With the medium of digital drawing and my rather realistic treatment of the subject, my aim is to work in the gaps between photography and traditional, physical drawing. I am aware that many people who happen upon my prints think that they are photos, at least initially. Digital drawing is a relatively new medium among more established visual art mediums. There are few precedents to act as visual references to help viewers approach this type of drawing. But hopefully, a tradition will gradually emerge to make viewers, including myself, more familiar with this new domain of imagery. A precedent can be found in the last two decades in photography (in art, design, and other fields), as viewers have come to expect a measure of manipulation in any photograph, whether this manipulation is apparent or not, ranging from obvious color and shape distortion to very subtle and invisible detail correction. Viewers in front of the actual prints of my work (24 x 32") are less likely to consider them photographs, as the drawing-like detail on the surface is more visible.
  
  TAL: The aerial view perspectives of your images suggest a disconnected point of view, one that isn't necessarily experienced by many people, but are familiar from satellite imagery, weather maps, surveillance images - and seems to suggest a very eerie feeling of being watched, or targeted - is there an intention an explicit criticism of suburbia, of expansion in your work?
  
  RR: I value the distant, aerial point of view as promoting an attitude of reflection about the world. The public in general has, in the last decade or so, experienced an increased familiarity with the aerial viewpoint, with the instant availability of satellite imagery on the Web. This type of image is quickly becoming as ubiquitous in daily experience as the map. The feeling of "being watched" you mention is not my intention, but nevertheless interesting. It depends on how much you identify with the residents of my suburbs. On the other hand, I acknowledge a feeling of "watching", as the viewer of my prints is in the position of the all-seeing observer. The watcher knows some things that the inhabitants of these subdivisions do not. My viewpoint is also that of the planner: the all-over, top-down approach of the decision maker. There is an obvious criticism of suburbia in my images, mainly through the exaggeration of certain of its characteristics. The suburbs are the fastest growing part of the urban environment in the majority of nations. But beyond the suburban example, these digital drawings are a way of thinking about design, the city and society as a whole. I would like my prints to remain as open as possible, to be triggers for reflection through analogy with various aspects of the world.
  
  TAL: The way you use the imagery of suburbia seems to imply visual conundrums - it feels as if you're being pulled into the detail of the work trying to sort out individual houses, drive ways... What's happening there?
  
  RR: I think the conundrum is due to the small size of the jpgs available on the Web. When in front of an actual 24 x 32" print, the viewer has the liberty to look at it from a certain distance to take in the overall composition and then to come nearer to examine the details within each "property", making the experience a more intimate one, almost like eavesdropping.
  
  
  
  
  Ross Racine, Subdivision, Cedar Valley, 2006.
  Digital drawing, 15 x 20 inches.
  
  
  TAL: By conundrum, the suggestion was that certain of your images, say for example the views of the housing estates as circles, some like question marks, many of them isolated like desert communities or clustered together in what appears to be empty space, have a very interesting visual play, like an Escher drawing or a jigsaw - were these the kinds of references you were looking at when began to create these drawings? Or was there some other inspiration?
  
  RR: I am inspired by diagrams, by the means by which information can be represented in visual form. The vocabulary of diagrams can be very straightforward and powerful. I use it for composition and also to imply that the suburbs' contents (material and human), seen from a high aerial viewpoint, may be also considered information. The word I use for my application of the idea of the diagram is structure. A related concern is the conflation of the macroscopic and microscopic scales suggested by the concept of structure. The observable world has many examples of organizations that are similar at both scales, for example the concentric structure. I am also interested in the implications of living within a specific structure, for example the experience of living in an endless accumulation of haphazardly connected streets.
  
  TAL: The images imply a science fictional formulation of suburbia. Do you imagine that there is a particular scenario going on in these places?
  
  RR: I am definitely open to a science fictional reading of my images and I leave the viewer to imagine possible narratives for an image, if a person is so inclined, but I wouldn't encourage the formation of definite scenarios. This would limit the evocative potential of the image. After all, my prints remain first and foremost images, not descriptions of established stories.
  
  Rossracine.com
• 

  This just in

  Posted: 5-February-2010, 1:06am CET

  Just as we posted our roundup of comments from our call for suggestions for influential shows [see below], we received an email from a reader we shall do the favour of calling Sgt. Schultz. Although not exactly what you'd call a "positive" suggestion, the good Sargeant remembers a stoush in the Sydney:
  
  

  Well, perhaps not influential, but I'd say Tony Bond's Body exhibition at AGNSW rates a mention for the following...
  
  A clear realization that if you really want to see particular master works, go overseas, they're never coming here. Bond's inclusion of prints of artworks he wanted for the show was a pretty stark reminder that even if they could be loaned, they won't come to the outposts. (Perhaps this has changed a little, and perhaps this embarrassing curatorial 'decision' spurred the good museum folks onto lobbying a bit harder and demanding standards that can not really be argued with. Maybe.)
  
  Secondly, Bond's inclusion of a substantial amount of his acknowledged friend Mike Parr's work. The ensuing battle in the SMH instigated by the esteemed critic, between himself, Bond and Parr reached fever pitch. McDonald eventually publishing a fictional fantasy dialogue. Not since (I couldn't really say if before) has arts coverage in Sydney and likely in Australia (with the exception of the Henson Fiasco) been afforded such column inches, a trait more common in the British press. For once, a seriously curated exhibition of contemporary art was given a good going round in the papers. Who cares what was said - it was there. The sensation was not tabloid, it was merely a mutual distaste between the combatants - who in turn fired off by turns intelligent and amusing missives and an editor willing to let it run. If only that would continue.